Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,801
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2012, 4:10 am
Her pioneering achievements will be an inspiration to people both within and outside the College, and I very much look forward to welcoming her to Oxford. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 3:13 am
Lord Justice Toulson commented “that the issues being investigated by the Inquiry affect the population as a whole. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm
and at [36]: The reality is that what the vast majority of people learn about judgments comes (understandably) from whatever news source they choose to use. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 1:21 pm
Gerson made delusional statements such as causing it to snow in Hawaii and having control because he was Lord Shiva. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:28 pm
From United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:12 am
From Usefully Employed (hat-tip) comes the news that the consultation on the Equality Bill proposes the introduction of indirect discrimination as a category, which would help with the horlicks that the Lords made of the 1995 Act in Malcolm v Lewisham: [the Bill shall] adopt the concept of indirect discrimination for the purposes of the disability discrimination provisions in the Equality Bill, rather than carry forward to the Equality Bill the existing provisions in the Disability… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am
In Rahman Lord Bingham and Lord Roger agreed with the decision in Gamble and held that D2 was not liable: it was as if two new people had jumped out of the bushes and murdered the victim. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Several of the majority decisions in Stott endorsed Lord Walker’s analysis in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63, [2009] 2 All ER 556 that the characteristics which fell within ECHR, art 14 were like a series of concentric circles: with the most personal innate characteristics being at the centre and requiring a high level of justification for differential treatment, and acquired characteristics (which are more concerned with what… [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Background In March 2012, Mr Khuja was one of a number of people arrested on suspicion of committing sexual offences against children in the Oxford area. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:18 pm
, People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
In the case preview for R v Gnango , it was suggested that the question facing the Supreme Court read like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
R (RJM) (FC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63 This House of Lords judgment is now just under two weeks old, but I think it is still worthy of comment here. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:00 am
Having considered the evidence, the Court concluded that the sharp, substantial and sustained fall in the number of claims warranted the conclusion that a significant number of people who would otherwise have brought claims have found the fees not to be reasonably affordable. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:14 am
Avizandum : Court of Session judge Lord Woolman to rule on Scotland’s longest running civil damages claim. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 10:45 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 As the prospect of a referendum on Scottish independence draws closer and those concerned with the destiny of British sterling, Scotch whisky and Chinese pandas intensify their discussions, questions have arisen meanwhile as to the legality of such a referendum and the judicial response to it. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:17 pm
Lord Justice Henry's held in Bailey v IBC Vehicles [1998] EWCA Civ 566 that: “The signature of the bill of costs under the Rules is effectively the certificate by an officer of the Court that the receiving party’s solicitors are not seeking to recover in relation to any item more than they have agreed to charge their client under a contentious business agreement. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Lord Walker points out that the 2002 Regulations were clearly aimed at catching foreign nationals seeking to take advantage of the UK benefit system (a point acknowledged by Lord Hope at para 49). [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:22 am
The case does not make new law, relying as it does on the House of Lords' test in Stack v Dowden, yet two judges in the lower courts and one Lord Justice in the Court of Appeal, applying that test, considered that the respondent was entitled to a 90% share in the property. [read post]
