Search for: "People v McNeil" Results 61 - 80 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2010, 4:47 pm
(Patent Docs) Opana (Oxymorphone) – US: Endo files patent infringement suit against Roxane in response to Para IV challenge (Patent Docs) Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo (Ethinyl estradiol, norgestimate) – US:Patent infringement complaint filed in New Jersey following a Paragraph IV certification: Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We don't know what this stuff means, and unless you're a doctor, chances are that you don't either.But we're pretty sure of one thing - that kind of jargon has very precise medical meaning to the people who do understand what's in these package inserts. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:30 am by azatty
They pitted small v. small employers, large v. large, municipal, gov’t., etc. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
More were able to recognize corporate v. peer source but not near 100%. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm by Bexis
McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, 672 F.3d 372 (5th Cir. 2012). [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Much of the recent debate in the U.S. has focused on the case of Loomis v Wisconsin. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 7:30 pm
  It recognizes the fact that ICBC often tells people that they aren’t injured at all and this brings their credibility into play. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 1:55 am by INFORRM
Sky Bet has been reprimanded by the ICO for unlawfully processing people’s data using advertising cookies without their consent. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:30 am by Jim Walker
Supreme Court in Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc., v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 9:17 am by Eric Goldman
McNeil * Three Keyword Advertising Decisions in a Week, and the Trademark Owners Lost Them All * Competitor Gets Pyrrhic Victory in False Advertising Suit Over Search Ads–Harbor Breeze v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Schweber and Anderson explain that under the test established in Brandenburg v. [read post]