Search for: "People v Means"
Results 61 - 80
of 28,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 10:14 am
And what they might well have meant is to punish extra hard people who molest people younger than ten. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:06 am
Most investors have likely heard about the King v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
”’” (Id. at p. 382, quoting Graham, supra, 560 U.S. at p. 69 and Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:32 am
However, I am not certain that people always know what that means. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:09 pm
For one thing, a defendant who causes the unavailability of a witness waives the right to confront the witness at trial, which means grand jury testimony is admissible. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:04 pm
(People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:32 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 11:22 am
” “Tellys” means hotels. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:57 am
So, the full case against Times v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:53 pm
Silence doesn't mean good. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
During these years, Radical Republicans, moderate Jeffersonian Republicans, Federalists, and the Supreme Court struggled to determine whether the meaning of the Constitution belonged to the people themselves, the people’s elected representatives, or the life-appointed justices ofthe Supreme Court.The same issue includes Aaron Knapp's The Legal Counterrevolution: The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Reform in 1787, which we noted as an SSRN paper. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:35 am
In Roper v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm
We instead care about how much is in your blood -- which means, in turn, in your head. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 2:02 pm
The fancy word wasn't just used to impress people; it fits perfectly. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:54 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:36 pm
(People v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 9:30 am
We have to make sure that people know and understand what undermining the rights of our most vulnerable people actually means. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 5:52 am
Yesterday, the Court of Appeals reversed this finding - People v Kozlow, 2007 NY Slip 03592. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:04 am
"Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity" does not mean "Innocent". [read post]
