Search for: "People v Mitchell (James)" Results 61 - 80 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 6:10 am by Zietlow, Rebecca E.
  In my book, The Forgotten Emancipator: James Mitchell Ashley and the Ideological Origins of Reconstruction, I argue that the Reconstruction Congress established a positive right to free labor with the Thirteenth Amendment and statutes enforcing that amendment. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
Kramer, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (Oxford, 2004) Danie [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of The College of Pharmacists of Manitoba v Jorgenson 2019 MBQB 87 Rempel J ordered a Winnipeg pharmacists to pay $150,000 in damages to his regulatory body which he accused of covering up the deaths of 24 indigenous people. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by INFORRM
  He added: “The only people I think need privacy are people who do bad things. [read post]
1 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Byrne (William Mitchell), James Ming Chen (Louisville), Marne Coit (Coit Consulting, Arkansas), Neil D. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The authors have conducted the first national study of workplace violence against young people in our country. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, November 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
The circuit court found that the Oklahoma court lacked personal jurisdiction over Frazee, but the Supreme Court of Missouri reversed in People’s Bank v. [read post]