Search for: "People v New York State Dept. of Corrections"
Results 61 - 80
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Regarding the Freedom of Information Law, Justice NeMoyer stated that: "The Legislature enacted FOIL to provide the public with a means of access to governmental records in order to encourage public awareness and understanding of and participation in government and to discourage official secrecy" (Alderson v New York State Coll. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 6:04 pm
In People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 9:56 am
Travel v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Subsequently, the defendant, who was employed by the New York City Police Department, retired on an accidental disability pension as a result of a line-of-duty injury. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:31 am
In Maybaum v Maybaum, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5244417 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) the defendant wife and the plaintiff husband were married on March 13, 1995. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The carp are dangerous to the eco-system, people, and property. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
”PEOPLE V. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
I was born back in Brooklyn, New York, I mostly grew up in Pittsburgh, and my wife’s from the City of Chicago… and I’m here to tell you that if someone tried to pull something like that on someone else in any of those places back when we were kids, the offending party would pray for the dispute to be settled in a courtroom, you know what I’m saying here? [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[7] Judges charged with making these custody decisions “rarely received the expert testimony of native people who could familiarize [them] with traditional child-rearing practices,” but instead relied upon the testimony of non-Indian social workers who were ignorant of the ways and traditions of Native Americans.[8] These social workers often advised courts that the abject poverty of many Indian families prevented them from properly parenting their… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[7] Judges charged with making these custody decisions “rarely received the expert testimony of native people who could familiarize [them] with traditional child-rearing practices,” but instead relied upon the testimony of non-Indian social workers who were ignorant of the ways and traditions of Native Americans.[8] These social workers often advised courts that the abject poverty of many Indian families prevented them from properly parenting their… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:59 am
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:46 am
State of New York U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:26 am
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:51 am
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:05 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
The Frye general acceptance test, however, continues to be the standard for determining reliability and admissibility of expert testimony in New York (see People v. [read post]
