Search for: "People v Novas"
Results 61 - 80
of 267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2012, 7:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada determined yesterday, in A.B. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:30 am
The article appears in Volume 38 of the Nova Law Review (2013). [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 6:05 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm
The announcement came soon after the worst mass shooting in Canadian history, on April 18-19, 2020, when 22 people died in Nova Scotia. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:03 am
A precedent-setting decision at the Ontario Court of Appeal this week strikes at the heart of client concerns over the abuse of billable hours, and provides a legal framework by which clients might be able to reject law firm fees considered excessive or unreasonable.The David-and-Goliath battle, Bank of Nova Scotia v. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 9:56 am
Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
For example, Manitoba, Nova Scotia and Ontario appellate courts encourage counsel and parties to share information about their titles and pronouns when introducing themselves in court. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:53 am
In Liu v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:49 pm
” Mr Justice LeBlanc, delivering judgment also considered the principles set out by the Canadian Supreme Court in Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 and R v Mentuck, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442 (“the Dagenais/Mentuck test”), namely that a request for a publication ban may be ordered when: (a) such an order is necessary in order to prevent a serious risk to the proper administration of justice because reasonably alternative measures… [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
[This is a 6k+ word blog post that was joyless to write and most likely will be joyless to read.] [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
VILARDELL v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:56 am
[Mikisew Cree First Nation v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
For example, in R. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:10 pm
It's really, really hard to cross-examine a transcript, which is why those robed people in D.C. bothered to decide Crawford v. [read post]
30 May 2015, 10:28 pm
Devemos estar cientes, também, que o processo de individualização tem sido usado como sinônimo de várias coisas. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:56 am
Plaintiffs suing for defamation seek to protect their reputation – what other people think of them, as Lord Denning (pic) defined it in Plato Films Ltd v Speidel [1961] AC 1090. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm
The post cites the costs to privacy, freedom of speech (such as the ‘legal but harmful’ concept), the ‘duty of care’ demanded of online service providers to limit or even ban both encryption and anonymity, the political control of censorship via Ofcom, and the “mammoth and costly bureaucratic burdens being foisted on people operating online services” as some of the many reasons that the proposed Bill might be doing more harm than good. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Nor does this COVID-19 vaccine requirement discriminate on the basis of any of the four grounds recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada to date as being analogous, which include i) citizenship (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia, 1989 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1989] 1 SCR 143); ii) marital status (Miron v Trudel, 1995 CanLII 97 (SCC), [1995] 2 SCR 418; Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v Walsh, 2002 SCC 83); iii) sexual orientation (Egan v Canada, 1995… [read post]
