Search for: "People v Rush" Results 61 - 80 of 1,117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
The objectively ascertainable personal injury caused by an assault bears no relation to a human evaluating and reacting to what people say and write. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Phil Dixon
Officer was entitled to qualified immunity on First Amendment claim relating to livestreaming of a traffic stop, but claim for Town’s policy against livestreaming may proceed Sharpe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[The mentally ill defendant "testified and described how shooting white people was part of his divine, preordained mission to establish 'a kingdom of infinite peace and progress.'”] From People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:13 pm by Florian Mueller
The FTC and DOJ's guiding principle these days--including this month's new United States et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:21 am by Florian Mueller
" Google opposes any trial date earlier than November 6 because of a potential conflict with the trial in the first United States et al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
In most legal orgs, this percentage is near negligible, especially if the org is being honest with itself about (i) how many personnel in putative innovation roles (legal operations, knowledge management, project management) are consumed by active matters, existing programs, and administration, (ii) how much technology spend is maintenance, and (iii) how many projects are purely aspirational with no real resources save the illusory spare hours of already busy people. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am by Michael Oykhman
Cases such as R v Nygaard, 1989 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 1074, R v Jacquard, 1997 CanLII 374 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 314, and R v More, 1963 CanLII 805 (MBCA) have helped us establish notions of what “planned and deliberate” murder entails. [read post]