Search for: "People v Samed (Steven)"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
The post Justice Stevens's Papers Reveal How The Fortune Cookies Were Baked In <I>Lawrence v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
If the prediction turns out to be true that June 1 is the drop-dead date, then June 2 would simply be the first day on which people could file suit to stop the President from doing what had previously been merely hypothetical. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:54 am
A First Amendment challenge to the law made it to the Supreme Court itself, which, in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]
10 May 2023, 9:30 pm
(OI, v.1, 331). [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
Of course, the same sources that are relevant to original intent are relevant to original meaning. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm
I don't think anything in the Stevens papers is likely to persuade many people to change their minds about the case. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
In the landmark case of Citizens United v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
I know that much time went into this release, including many hours over at least one very taxing weekend put in by Melissa Roverts Harke, Robert Holowka, Sirimal Mukerjee, Adele Kittredge Murray, Neema Nassiri-Motlagh, Jill Pritzker, David Stevens, Thomas Strumpf, Sarah ten Siethoff, and Samuel K. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
John v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
Additionally, virtual goods will be treated in the same way as physical goods with “downloadable virtual clothing, footwear or headgear” being identified as acceptable examples. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
To take one example: many people have tried to explain to me how holding companies work, but Mark, at page 970, is the only person who has succeeded. [read post]
Can fishermen be required to pay for federal monitors? And by the way – should Chevron be overruled?
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am
Enough people think this case may have legs that a whopping fourteen amicus briefs were filed supporting the petition. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:30 am
Justice Stevens had died in April 2020. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
In Knick v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
”[29] If this same logic were to apply to museums, they primarily serve a white, wealthy, and highly-educated class of people; acting more like a club, by not affirmatively reaching out to different classes of people who are currently not using their services, they are therefore possibly violating the no substantial private benefits provision. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Rogers v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:35 am
The case, Chason v. [read post]
