Search for: "People v Snowden"
Results 61 - 80
of 252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution prohibits “Bill[s] of Attainder,” laws that, under Supreme Court precedent, “legislatively determine[] guilt and inflict[] punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial” (Nixon v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:51 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
” Wyoming v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 8:21 am
Snowden's put forward, all the stories that have been written, what you're not reading about is the government actually abusing these programs and, you know, listening in on people's phone calls or inappropriately reading people's e-mails. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm
Upstream is at issue in EFF’s Jewel v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:08 am
PPD-28 stated forthrightly that the U.S. strove to respect the privacy rights of all people around the world. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:55 pm
So what was McConnell saying pre-Snowden? [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:20 pm
There is some good news: The government had also moved to stay First Unitarian Church v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:16 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm
NSA, and Jewel v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:59 am
NSA or the Snowden revelations yet. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 1:55 pm
Circuit’s opinion in al Bahlul v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 12:14 pm
Our amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
" Further, in the event there is conflicting evidence, the Appellate Division said it must defer to the Hearing Officer's credibility determinations.Finding that there was substantial evidence in the record to support finding Petitioner guilty of the charges served upon him pursuant to §75 alleging that he had committed acts of misconduct that constituted crimes," the Appellate Division sustained the appointing authority's decision to impose the penalty of… [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:22 am
In Schrems v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am
Maryland, to argue that people have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their phone records under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 6:45 am
A federal district court yesterday dismissed Wikimedia v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
" Further, in the event there is conflicting evidence, the Appellate Division said it must defer to the Hearing Officer's credibility determinations.Finding that there was substantial evidence in the record to support finding Petitioner guilty of the charges served upon him pursuant to §75 alleging that he had committed acts of misconduct that constituted crimes," the Appellate Division sustained the appointing authority's decision to impose the penalty of… [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
Five years after we filed Jewel, and responding to further revelations in 2013 by whistleblower Edward Snowden, we filed First Unitarian Church v NSA on behalf of nearly two dozen organizations from across the political spectrum. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:53 pm
See Landrigan v. [read post]
