Search for: "People v Strange" Results 61 - 80 of 1,408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2019, 9:01 am by Walter Olson
” [Ilya Shapiro and Patrick Moran on Cato cert amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to review Mitchell v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Strangely, the opinion does not cite either of the two recent Court of Appeal cases on this subject, People ex rel. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Indeed, it is impossible to understand last Term’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Adam Wagner
In short, people with low enough IQs cannot always validly consent to sex, but as much as possible should be done to find out if they are able to make the decision for themselves. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:00 am by Anna Price
She previously authored The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program and Hansberry v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
This seems strange, but if that's what the law says, okay, I guess.Second, the holding deepens the mystery behind the age-old question, first posed by the Beatles in the White Album in 1968: to wit, "Why don't we do it in the road? [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm
But I must say that it's a little strange coming from an en banc decision in which Judge Bumatay's opinion on the matter gets outvoted 10-1, without a single judge on the en banc panel -- even those judges who typically vote alongside Judge Bumatay -- adopting his position in this one.Sometimes you're totally convinced you're right even though the rest of the world, including some very bright people, says you're wrong. [read post]