Search for: "People v. A.C"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Inco was for many years the major employer in the Port Colborne area, employing as many as 2,000 people. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
In February 2009, S was convicted in Reading Crown Court for violent offences committed during an unprovoked attack on four people in September 2006. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Mohindroo v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:20 am
Before Donoghue v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
X v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 1:42 pm
Div’n of Youth & Family Servs. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Distinguishing the House of Lords decision in Denny-Mott and Dixon v James Fraser and Co [1944] A.C. 265, the judge held that the contract between the Club and IRISL was to provide indemnity insurance and that “[p]art of that purpose remained lawful. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
Fareham Urban District Council [1956] A.C. 696] in response to a suggestion that we go shopping. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:19 pm
The Queen, 1 A.C. 304 (1969) Silver v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am
Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:00 am
That is, "a commission is due upon the total amount which passes through the receiver's hands" (Matter of Jakubowicz v A.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:09 pm
Judge Jarman QC found that s.35 was ambiguous and, hence, that he was entitled to have regard to the Hansard debates that surrounded s.35 and the subsequent amendments, applying Pepper v Hart [1993] A.C. 593, HL. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 3:40 pm
In A.C. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 10:55 am
Michael v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
The Court adopted the test of Caparo Industries Ltd v Dickman [1990] 2 A.C. 605 in establishing duty of care: Was the injury and loss reasonably foreseeable? [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 7:45 am
Here is another one:The Court of Appeals of Kansas' recent opinion in State v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 7:29 am
Reid Nelson from the Capital and Conflicts Appeals Office won in State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 8:37 pm
Pemsel, [1891] A.C. 531. [read post]
