Search for: "People v. Andrews (1999)"
Results 61 - 80
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
To reach this aim, living standards of the people had to be raised and productive capacities developed. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
Haviland used to work for/with the first (The Andrew Lownie Literary Agency Ltd) and second (Lownie) defendants. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
This led to an occupation of the site by members of the tribe, with 222 people eventually evicted by police after 506 days. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
And so, even as a great many peoples worship the idea of the formless, they cannot help but provide manifestations of that formlessness as a bridge (and then ultimately as the thing itself). [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:17 am
Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 5:53 pm
People change their minds. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
And Humphreys busied himself ordering multiple people arrested people for failing to swear allegiance to the Confederate States of America. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:52 am
These cases include United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
After being acquired by GM, it was subsequently spun off as part of Delphi in 1999. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
It's based on amicus briefs that Michael Dorf (Cornell), Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), and I filed in past cases (and that I blogged about before), but it elaborates somewhat further on that argument. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
"Games might be and [are] the serious business of life to many people. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
The Article was written by Andrew Dickal. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
Snarky Numbered Lists Visits Crazytown” “Marc Stephens’ Downfall” Vote for Popehat’s “Censorious Asshat of the Year” “Andrew Wakefield Sues BMJ and Brian Deer: Time To Test Out the New Texas Anti-SLAPP Statute” “Chris McGrath v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
