Search for: "People v. Appellate Department (1996)"
Results 61 - 80
of 187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2021, 7:44 am
” People v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Wells v DeMarco, 2018 NY Slip Op 07740, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentSusai Francis, an Indian national living on Long Island, had overstayed his visa. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
UK (2008) 47 EHRR 40, a lot of people (around these parts) have been waiting for a case on Article 8 and the rule in Hammersmith v Monk (Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
UK (2008) 47 EHRR 40, a lot of people (around these parts) have been waiting for a case on Article 8 and the rule in Hammersmith v Monk (Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 10:20 am
He stated that the accommodation was a studio property, which was only suitable for up to 2 people. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:21 am
Soc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 9:31 am
The Appellate Division affirmed. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am
Morgan, 88 F.3d 620, 625-26 (8th Cir. 1996); Nilson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
R (Ali) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another case, heard 25-26 February 2015. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:57 am
" But "a federal appellate court makes no assessment of the true facts. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
District Court in Boston under the name of Gill v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
White warned against unsupervised use of government power to spy on the people. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:01 am
Gosden v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1996.Ungar, Sanford J. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am
State appealed and appellate court reversed. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 9:25 am
Cobell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:07 am
App.4th 389 (1996)). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
This Court has explained: "It is axiomatic that the courts must be independent and must not be subject to the whim of either the executive or legislative departments. [read post]
