Search for: "People v. Billings" Results 61 - 80 of 9,447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The heartbeat bill would have violated Supreme Court cases going back to Roe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm by Gaetan Gerville-Reache
On July 31, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a 4-3 opinion in People v. [read post]
The post US House approves bill protecting abortion access appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Source: Stas_V / iStock / Getty Images The legislature passed Assembly Bill (AB) 5 late September 10, a bill that largely codifies the 2018 Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm
  We routinely charge people with first-degree murder in cases in which we in fact end up getting a conviction under the felony murder doctrine. [read post]
29 May 2013, 4:54 am by David DePaolo
Everyone's a victim...Whether DSM-V may or may not have an impact directly on workers' compensation systems is irrelevant - DSM-V makes more people ill when they were previously considered to be normally functioning.We don't need more ill people in this country. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:35 am by JB
Whether or not the individual Justices viewed their actions this way at the time, many people saw Bush v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
This act takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the 90 days after the final adjournment of the general assembly, except that if a referendum petition is filed under section 1 (3) of Article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:42 am
The bill is structured to satisfy the framework requirement laid down by the Supreme Court in T.N.Godavarman Thirumulpad v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 10:31 am by Clay
  Jacque's exact proposal was specifically rejected by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals and the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2007- see Leitinger v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 11:41 am by India McKinney
Hit the button below to tell your elected officials to vote against this bill: Take action TELL congress: Defeat this bad 702 Bill Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:36 am by Administrator
In S and Marper v UK 30562/04 [2008] ECHR 1581 (4 December 2008) one of the reasons given by the European Court of Human Rights for holding that the UK’s retention of innocent people’s DNA records on a criminal register infringed their right to privacy was the lack of sufficiently strong safeguards. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 pm by INFORRM
  This bill had its formal first reading on 10 May 2012. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:47 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
The post How the Dobbs Ruling Will Affect People with Substance Use Disorder appeared first on Bill of Health. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:02 am by Eric Posner
(For some Supreme Court dicta, see U.S. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
There are three clauses of the Bill of Rights Bill [pdf] which, if enacted in their current form, would have a direct impact on freedom of expression cases. [read post]