Search for: "People v. Brain"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,396
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am
From today's North Dakota Supreme Court decision in Wrigley v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The second Colombian case, Siett v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In Pelech v Pelech, [1984] CanLII 629 (BC SC), Mrs. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:33 pm
by Neil H. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
Mann, against National Review magazine, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn.[1] Back in 2014, I commented upon the oddity of a scientist’s claim of defamation against lay people for criticizing a scientist’s work.[2] Mann took umbrage to statements, critical of his work that generated a “hockey-stick” model of global temperature rises. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:31 am
The 49 years of Roe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
In doing so, he actually hurt many people. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Brain scans for consumers? [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 8:15 am
The DSM-V lists the diagnostic criteria for conversion disorder. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 9:00 am
One such example is the case of Abrams v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
Farahany said much can be learned about a person from their brain data and “we ought to have a special place we think about when it comes to the brain. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 2:49 pm
"] From Joseph v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
” Pomerantz also acknowledges that “the conversation with the ‘brain trust’ had left [Dunne] ‘on the fence’ about charging Trump. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 10:04 am
He says (in summary) that "It is rational to infer that a person who, over a few weeks, struck an infant in ways that broke most of his ribs, fractured his skull, wounded his brain recurrently, and induced head-to-toe bruises “could not have been unaware” that death could result from the blows. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:30 am
Supreme Court made in Campbell v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm
We can't go around sharing people's records! [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
By Atreya Mathur “By far, the greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
In most legal orgs, this percentage is near negligible, especially if the org is being honest with itself about (i) how many personnel in putative innovation roles (legal operations, knowledge management, project management) are consumed by active matters, existing programs, and administration, (ii) how much technology spend is maintenance, and (iii) how many projects are purely aspirational with no real resources save the illusory spare hours of already busy people. [read post]
