Search for: "People v. Childs"
Results 61 - 80
of 6,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2013, 4:59 am
(People v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:33 pm
She advises you to just pay child support if you don't want the child. [read post]
20 May 2015, 10:32 am
In M.R.D. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
Even if the defendant is himself a child. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:48 pm
The Supreme Court this morning decided Kennedy v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 11:54 am
” Clubb v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:00 am
Sinclair v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:13 pm
People, 389 P.3d 100, 108 (Colo. 2017) (`[T]he presence of photos in the internet cache alone does not automatically establish knowing possession. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 3:50 pm
To figure out what the defendant's sentence was, all you need to know are the offenses for which he was convicted:"Defendant was convicted of five counts of sexual penetration of a child 10 years old or younger; 1 three counts of oral copulation of a child 10 years old or younger; five counts of preparing pornographic images of a minor; one count of possessing child pornography; and one count of sexual exploitation of a child. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 3:35 pm
Yet there you are at the end, sexually abusing a child and taking pictures of it.Ugh. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:30 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court issued an opinion supported by a 4 justice majority in People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:10 pm
Possessing child pornography is worse than committing statutory rape. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am
The court in Sacklow v Betts very recently encountered the issue of a legal name change in NJ for a transgender child. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 pm
In Dawn M. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 8:50 am
Truman v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
The Case The underlying facts in People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:09 am
” Blisset v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:42 pm
When people are prosecuted for possession of child pornography, judges forget that the United States is a nation of laws. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:47 am
I'm not sure how effective the cause of action against people who viewed the child pornography is going to be, though. [read post]
