Search for: "People v. Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments"
Results 61 - 80
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2018, 12:11 am
I'm so grateful for the great support I've received from Google that I won't comment publicly on Oracle v. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 12:32 pm
Vermont Department of Taxes v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
That also means that it will be as important for states to provide a means of training people to read and assess these reports as it is for states to develop the ability to produce them. 6. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:00 am
The recent Tax Court decision in Woodley v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am
We recommend that firms discuss the annual review with their outside counsel or compliance firm, who can provide guidance about the review process as well as a template for the assessment and documentation. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am
We recommend that firms discuss the annual review with their outside counsel or compliance firm, who can provide guidance about the review process as well as a template for the assessment and documentation. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
For example, if you ask a state tax officer when were the assessments? [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 10:21 am
Fiduciary Duty v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
As President, I must act to protect the security and interests of the United States and its people. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
One provision being discussed in the reform package would prohibit city commissioners from helping to raise money for candidates. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
For an example, look no further than the celebrated Costeja v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 4:48 am
In Gann v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:36 am
Arizona v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm
We recommend that firms discuss the annual review with their outside counsel or compliance firm, who can provide guidance about the review process as well as a template for the assessment and documentation. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 8:19 am
The Tax Department denied the request and also assessed a penalty. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 7:01 am
Voss v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:00 pm
Citibank, N.A. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm
’ He also said that ‘When people and companies use legal means to minimize their tax bills, that’s not corrupt or greedy or unfair, it’s playing by the rules. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Along with the three MPs’ expenses cases discussed above, it sits well alongside Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority v Information Commissioner and Leapman [2015] EWCA 388 in underlining the critical importance of the public itself being able to assess the genuineness of politicians’ expense claims. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
This was the standard that had been applied in Burnip, and was said to find further support in the Supreme Court’s decision in Humphreys v Revenue and Customs Commissioners. [read post]
