Search for: "People v. Courts (1985)"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
Ginsberg v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 2:45 pm
Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 – Fla: Supreme Court 1985 There is a risk in enforcing alimony in Florida. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:49 pm
Lindh v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
” In 1985, the Supreme Court upheld this approach in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
But the Supreme Court cases recognizing this right confine it to narrow fields, such as education, Meyer v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
” The court denied review in Roberts v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
That court could not escape acknowledging the similarities between this case and Hunter v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
As Chief Justice Morawetz enters his 5th year as head of the Ontario Superior Court, it is both appropriate and necessary (given the court’s acknowledged culture of complacency) to ask “how well is he overseeing court operations? [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:48 pm
T.L.O, 469 U.S. 325 (1985). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
As the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) explains in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm
My Take The September 23, 1985 assignment from Gallo to Sweet Revenge is strange for a number of reasons. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm
” People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:24 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
It is through them that the living spirits of our people, of our history, of our culture interact and interface with us. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 pm
I suspect they will be preoccupying quite a few people for a while. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:19 am
Isn’t it great when people work collaboratively on a noble cause and grand success happens? [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:16 pm
[The decision is at odds with Supreme Court precedent, and endangers the constitutional rights of millions of people. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
” Calabresi not only knew Reich well, but, like Reich, had clerked for Justice Black during a period when the Supreme Court grappled with loyalty/security cases. [read post]
