Search for: "People v. Fews"
Results 61 - 80
of 14,793
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 11:28 am
Thus, it may be that Judge Bobay was right to conclude that tacos and burritos are "Mexican-style sandwiches," even if few people would actually refer to them in that way. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:00 am
There are often few if any witnesses to what happened beyond the people involved. [read post]
16 May 2024, 3:00 am
NIH has since paused clinical trials for 3K3A-APC, a stroke drug sponsored by ZZ Biotech, a Houston-based company co-founded by Berislav V. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm
" Ricci v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am
” A few days later, Troupis did just that, and sent Chesebro’s memo to Trump Campaign attorney Justin Clark. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 3:04 pm
Many of the incidents followed the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm
Italy enacted a ban last year, and Florida and Alabama enacted their laws on the books in only the last few days. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
Few scraping defendants would have dared to litigate these facts. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:12 am
The case is Governors Ridge Office Park Association v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am
[7] Maslowski et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am
The news is simple – Title II entities must over the next few years bring their websites and mobile apps into conformance with WCAG 2.1 AA. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:32 am
Today's U.S. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
“Obscenity” is one of a few categories of speech that may be regulated by states consistent with the First Amendment (see Penal Law § 235.00).[4] The U.S. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
“Obscenity” is one of a few categories of speech that may be regulated by states consistent with the First Amendment (see Penal Law § 235.00).[4] The U.S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
It also helps explain why few people have "voted with their feet" to move to pro-choice states since Dobbs. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am
As a result, only a few people who had representation have managed to challenge these administrative concealment penalties for Lost Wages Assistance. [read post]
