Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 61 - 80 of 5,589
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm
 Which is in turn why the expert's testimony is inadmissible to the per se offense at issue.Which some people may perhaps be fine with. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
Juror John V. himself was convicted of DUI by plea. . . . [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 4:50 pm
Someone can look at two entirely similar people/jurors and while one of them -- the white/majority/male one -- might seem "fine, even though a bit overly confident for my own tastes," it's distinctly possible for that same person to view a quite-similarly-situated minority/female juror (or person) as "aggressive" or "uppity" or "hostile". [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 10:47 am
But here's the caption on the Ninth Circuit's opinion: LORENZO ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm
Rather, as long as the warrant says (as they all do) that the "facts in support of this warrant are contained in the Statement of Probable Cause and any exhibits, which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference," and the probable cause statement asks for something additional -- something that's NOT actually ordered by the warrant -- that's fine too.So, here, the police asked the court to allow them to use the suspect's finger to unlock the computer, but the… [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 12:01 pm
 That's what the executive does.So it's okay to fine Simpson for the yellow line violation. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 6:13 pm
The distinctions that we draw in search and seizure jurisprudence are sometimes such fine ones.The Supreme Court says that "headlong flight" plus "narcotics area" plus "has a bag" lets you search. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
I'm fine to let a jury decide.But it is my firm opinion that the relevant people in the Santa Clark County Sheriff's Office belong behind bars.Here's the basic scoop:"The Penal Code authorizes, but does not require, county sheriffs to issue licenses to carry concealed weapons to applicants who are of good moral character, have good cause for a license, reside or work in the county, and have completed a specified course of training. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
  What you are really pleading is "not guilty by reason of insanity," and the People are agreeing. [read post]