Search for: "People v. Gibson (1988)" Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As Counsel notes, the evident intent of the subdivision (c) is to ‘protect the people’s initiative powers by precluding the Legislature from undoing what the people have done, without the electorate’s consent. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
He is a 1988 graduate of the Yale Law School and a former clerk to Justice Harry Blackmun. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the space below, I discuss another effort, albeit this time via the judiciary rather than the legislature, to prevent the people from formally weighing in on another hot-button issue: campaign finance reform. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
He is a 1988 graduate of the Yale Law School and a former clerk to Justice Harry Blackmun. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Many commentators, including members of Congress and presidents, criticize judicial rulings as being influenced by improper philosophies or even by improper desires to protect partisan interests—think, for example, about the criticism of the conservative majorities in Bush v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
One might relate, empirically, to how constrained people actually feel when they are criticized by administrators who run an institution. [read post]