Search for: "People v. Hastings" Results 61 - 80 of 390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2009, 8:54 pm
By Mike Dorf And now . . . still more on CLS v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:00 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Every one of those politicians in robes found himself or herself on the precipice of achieving what was almost surely their most sought-after lifetime goal: slaying the Roe v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 6:12 pm
I'm not going to do an in depth analysis of yesterday's Cal Supremes decision in Murphy v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Under this “classification-rather-than-class-of-persons” approach, if race is a problematic basis for sorting people (because its use historically has generated socio-political costs) in cases like Brown v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am by Rory Little
Cotchett Professor of Law at UC Hastings College of the Law. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:22 pm
 He attempted to distinguish such an exclusion as status-based, whereas CLS, he claimed, only wanted to exclude people based on beliefs. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:00 pm by EEM
"Escaping Forced Gang Recruitment: Establishing Eligibility for Asylum after Matter of S-E-G," Hastings Law Journal, vol. 63, no. 5 (2012) [full-text] Note sur la procédure de reconnaissance du droit d’asile: Allemagne, États-Uni, Italie, Pays-Bas, Royaume-Uni, Suède (France, Sénat, mars 2012) [text via Refworld] "Plight of the Boat People: How to Determine State Obligations to Asylum Seekers," Notre Dame Law Review, vol.… [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:59 pm by pittlegalscholarship
San Diego Evan Lee (UC Hastings) Tulsa Bethany Berger (Connecticut Law) presents “Williams v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:03 pm by Jo-Ann Wallace
  In our haste to define adequate alternative safeguards to counsel in this area, we must be very careful not to erode what we already have. [read post]