Search for: "People v. I. C. C"
Results 61 - 80
of 7,356
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:11 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
As a reminder for those familiar, the acts that trigger an excise tax include: (i) taxes on the private foundation’s net investment income,[15] (ii) prohibitions on self-dealing transactions,[16] (iii) failure to make the required five percent (5%) qualifying distributions to charities,[17] (iv) prohibition on excess business holdings,[18] (v) prohibition on holding jeopardizing investments,[19] and (vi) taxable expenditures,[20] none of which apply to a… [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
I remember an earlier cafeteria Catholic, Governor Mario Cuomo of New York. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
§ 1226(c), covering “any alien who . . . [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
The People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
For example, in the 2014 case of Hobby Lobby v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
In a recent article, I argue for moving beyond narrow views of profit maximization toward a broader, more richly described theory of plural business purposes.[10] I argue not only against a narrow view of the economic objective of profit maximization, but also for objectives that recognized the larger place of business organizations within society. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm
Such is the case in Ninestar Corporation et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 3:04 am
” Nicholson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
People who had to figure out a way to pay for their mortgage, education, retirement, and so on. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
Toth v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:14 am
” People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
Steffel v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:27 am
Papish v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:58 am
Code 801(c). [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
The introduction into the church of a new moveable font, without a faculty; c. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Cutting to the chase, I agree with Amy Howe's assessment (on SCOTUSblog) of yesterday's Supreme Court oral argument in FDA v. [read post]
