Search for: "People v. Ing" Results 61 - 80 of 1,781
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The first clause—what John Vlahoplus helpfully refers to as the “Positions Clause”—identifies the government offices and other employments that a covered rebel or insurrectionist is prohibited from “hold[ing]. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  This is also the underlying constitutional question in the Supreme Court's Moore v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
It also prohibits states from maintaining regular armies and navies in time of peace, and absolutely bars them from “engag[ing] in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm by Norman L. Eisen
On Friday, in anticipation of Trump’s “seek[ing] to sow chaos” in the trial, Carroll’s team asked Judge Kaplan for “prophylactic measures. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:54 am by Nicholas Caputo
In particular, it prevents platforms from “censor[ing] a user, a user’s expression, or a user’s ability to receive the expression of another person” based on “(1) the viewpoint of the user or another person; (2) the viewpoint represented in the user’s expression or another person’s expression; or (3) a user’s geographic location in [Texas]. [read post]