Search for: "People v. Ives"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Ct. 1731, 1755 (2020) (Alito, J., dissenting) (statutory words “mean what they conveyed to reasonable people at the time they were written” (citation omitted)); Kisor v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
” iv. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 10:48 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 am
[See Prigg v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
Nicaragua specifically alleged that Israel violated the Article I ban on genocide (under the Article II definition), are liable for punishment under Article III, must be punished under Article IV, and that a trial should follow under Article VI with all Contracting Parties already having enacted legislation outlawing genocide under Article V. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Defined at (iv) above, bare comment is more easily understood by way of example. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:52 am
Background In Dr David Miller v University of Bristol [2024] ET 1400780/2022, the claimant was appointed Professor of Political Sociology at the University from 1 September 2018. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
An excerpt from today's Appellate Court of Connecticut decision in Ambrose v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
In particular, it discusses the weaknesses of Roe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
However, the claim that a large increase in the number of would-be migrants gaining entry at the southern border constitutes an “invasion” under Article IV is constitutional nonsense. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 1:40 pm
" Arizona v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:31 am
” G.S. 7B-4001, Article IV, (a)(2). [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:23 am
” People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
Diese Konvention ist ein zentrales Instrument des Völkerrechts, um das "nie wieder" umzusetzen. [read post]
