Search for: "People v. Jackson (1984)" Results 61 - 80 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
” The case turned on whether undocumented workers qualify as “employees” under the National Labor Relations Act, an issue that the Supreme Court answered affirmatively in 1984, in Sure-Tan, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Arguably when judges use their position to solicit contributions they misuse the judicial office and may cause people to feel intimidated or coerced into donating.[118] Judges might take advantage of the prestige of their office to solicit money for an organization, and this may occur even in circumstances where such conduct cannot be described as involving intimidation.[119] The prestige of the judicial office is not intended to be used as a vehicle to advance economic, financial, social,… [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
Cir. 1984), probably the first reported monitoring case, involved possible effects of sudden airplane cabin de-pressurization. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
For example, Jackson’s notorious “spoils system” required each person who received a patronage appointment to pay a percentage of their salaries to the Democratic Party for use in future campaigns. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  Courts had long adapted common-law rules to “new conditions arising out of modern progress”; now they should recognize that “the upper air is a natural heritage common to all of the people. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm by admin
  The altruism some people would substitute for it may, when it has arrived, bring with it a higher sense of justice but it has not arrived. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Disproportionate Number of Outbreaks due to Raw Milk Consumption: Only ~1% of people drink raw milk in the United States, yet raw dairy products cause over 50% of the milkborne outbreaks W [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]