Search for: "People v. Juvenile Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
As the Court stated: `people living together [who] fall within some recognized hierarchy, like a household of parent and child,’ might ha [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 11:13 am
"The juvenile court found that Dean W. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 3:08 pm
The juvenile court is then to impose an appropriate disposition within its discretion under juvenile court law. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:03 am
Juvenile offenders should get the chance at parole, and redemption; we hope the court concurs. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Can Young People Consent to the Vaccine? [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:12 pm
People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:02 am
Michael Steinberg Colorado Criminal Defense Lawyer for Juvenile Crimes In the Colorado juvenile case of F.M. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
Simmons and of people of any age for crimes against individuals other than murder last year in Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:03 am
The court went on to explain that under People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 4:32 pm
The cases are _____ v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:59 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:11 am
This May, the Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 5:21 am
People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm
Earlier coverage of Miller v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 2:00 pm
The Supreme Court ruled in the 2005 case Roper v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:21 pm
Before the Act was enacted, many juvenile courts did not think twice of throwing minors into adult prisons for long periods of time without tailoring the sentence to the juvenile crime or giving the minor due process. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:47 pm
Rather, young offenders, except those whose conduct a court deems deserving of treatment as adults, are classified as juvenile delinquents and placed in juvenile detention centers. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:46 am
Here's the rare case involving a juvenile offense that occurred entirely within Contra Costa County and that's nonetheless decided in the San Diego Superior Court with a San Diego judge and an appeal in the Fourth Appellate District. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 8:57 am
And: But there is a third possible retort, one that draws on the Supreme Court’s 2002 decision in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm
For example, recent cases percolating through the appellate courts here in Michigan address whether SCOTUS' Miller decision should be applied retroactively.In People v Carp, for example, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the SCOTUS' Eighth Amendment ruling did not apply retroactively. [read post]
