Search for: "People v. Leahy"
Results 61 - 80
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2009, 7:53 am
Both Jeralyn and I wrote about the Ninth Circuit decision (PDF) in Mohamed v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 8:33 am
See Smith v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
Senator Leahy is a senator from Vermont. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:26 pm
Riegel and the dreadful decision they may well make in Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:26 pm
Riegel and the dreadful decision they may well make in Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm
The Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act (POWADA) (S. 2189) introduced by Senators Tom Harkin (D-IA), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), and Patrick Leahy (D-VT) would explicitly reject the June 18, 2009 Supreme Court decision in Gross v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:50 pm
This morning’s argument in Helsinn v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:08 pm
Ohio, Eddings v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 7:24 am
The oral argument yesterday in Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
The subject of black box came up in the Questions for the Record from Chairman Leahy. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
In People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm
In the 2005 MGM Studios v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 10:03 am
In the landmark 2006 case, Hamdan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 1:00 pm
The law struck down in Larson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:46 am
Schumer is making the case that SS is non-empathetic (even when the parties in question are the survivors of people killed in a plane crash) and, a fortiori, impartial.Next: Washington v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:00 am
By Shubha Ghosh, Vilas Research Fellow and Professor of Law at the University of Wisconsin Law School Whether the "Leahy-Smith America Invents Act' will help to create jobs is a complicated empirical question. [read post]
