Search for: "People v. Levell (1988)" Results 61 - 80 of 461
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2021, 6:55 pm
Brattain, 44 Cal. 3d 474, 479 (1988); Haraguchi v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Canada (Attorney General), 1988 CanLII 67 (SCC), [1988] 1 S.C.R. 513, at p. 558, per L’Heureux-Dubé J. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:31 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Section 34 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (the “RTA 1988”) makes it an offence to drive a vehicle on a TVG without lawful authority. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Whether in the declarations of politicians, labour leaders, or newspaper editorials, codified in legislation or orders in council, or practiced at the level of harassment, intimidation, and violence on the street, Canadian law enabled, enacted, and tolerated discrimination against Japanese Canadians and Asian Canadians more broadly. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Although levied at the importer, distributor, or large consumer level, the costs are likely fully or partially passed on to consumers and businesses further down in the supply chain. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
As a result, through the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1988 (FVRA), Congress provided general authority enabling the president to temporarily fill vacancies in high-level federal government positions. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Smith for their insightful critiques of my book, Gay Rights v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm by Giles Peaker
According to the judgment The claimant was born on 11 November 1988. [read post]