Search for: "People v. London (1988)" Results 61 - 80 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
Waitangi Day protest, 2006 (Photo by Flickr user Charlie Brewer, Feb. 6, 2006, used under Creative Commons License 2.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). 1901: In Nireaha Tamaki v Baker, the Privy Council in London ruled that the courts did have jurisdiction to determine whether the land in dispute had been ceded to the Crown, in contrast to the approach that the New Zealand courts had taken since the Wi Parata case. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
More recently, video footage on the Internet shows police dogs chasing and threatening people during the riots in 2011 in Vancouver and London. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
More recently, video footage on the Internet shows police dogs chasing and threatening people during the riots in 2011 in Vancouver and London. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 11:05 am by Giles Peaker
I do not agree with Mr Forsdick’s characterisation that doing so simply meant that it was providing more housing to more people without creating any discernible downsides. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
More recently, video footage on the Internet shows police dogs chasing and threatening people during the riots in 2011 in Vancouver and London. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
Pix Credit hereThe greatest and most significant achievement during the last decades has been the independence from colonial and alien domination of a large number of peoples and nations which has enabled them to become members of the community of free peoples. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am by admin
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
City of New London both indicate that the “for public use” portion of the Takings Clause restricts condemnations further than normal due process limits on state police power. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
This would prevent judges from åany enticement to lend the prestige of the judicial office to benefit other interests.[122] It would also have the beneficial effect of preventing the appearance of judicial impropriety.[123] . . . . _____________________________ 84 Judiciary of England and Wales, Guide to Judicial Conduct 2013 (London: Judges’ Council, 2013) Acknowledgements at 4 [Guide], onli [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm by The Book Review Editor
” The chemical weapons attack on the Iraqi Kurdistan town of Halabja on March 16, 1988 killed thousands of people and was the worst single chemical attack undertaken by the Saddam regime, not to mention by far the largest use of chemical weapons in an otherwise mostly short list since the end of WWII. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
  One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]