Search for: "People v. London (1988)"
Results 61 - 80
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm
The Court of Appeal considered affordability and the proper approach to it in Farah v London Borough of Hillingdon [2014] EWCA Civ 359. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
This text may seem a little puzzling to people who don't walk the streets of London, but there was some rhyme and reason: it was in response to a very striking advertisement by gay rights campaign organisation Stonewall, which read: "SOME PEOPLE ARE GAY, GET OVER IT!" [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm
” The chemical weapons attack on the Iraqi Kurdistan town of Halabja on March 16, 1988 killed thousands of people and was the worst single chemical attack undertaken by the Saddam regime, not to mention by far the largest use of chemical weapons in an otherwise mostly short list since the end of WWII. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:30 am
Tamiz v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Sharif v The London Borough of Camden [2013] UKSC 10Does accommodation available for occupation by a person and those reasonably expected to reside with them have to be in one unit of accommodation? [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Sharif v The London Borough of Camden [2013] UKSC 10Does accommodation available for occupation by a person and those reasonably expected to reside with them have to be in one unit of accommodation? [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 11:25 am
They are derived from a licence given to the agency by the property owner.If we take this at face value, and put aside thoughts of Street v Mountford and Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406, then these may indeed be licences to occupy, rather than tenancies.But what of the two week notice period to terminate the occupier’s licence asserted by many of these Property Guardian firms (for example here, here, here and here)? [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 11:25 am
They are derived from a licence given to the agency by the property owner.If we take this at face value, and put aside thoughts of Street v Mountford and Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406, then these may indeed be licences to occupy, rather than tenancies.But what of the two week notice period to terminate the occupier’s licence asserted by many of these Property Guardian firms (for example here, here, here and here)? [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Preamble Since the announcements of the iPhone and Microsoft's Surface (both in 2007), an especially large number of people have asked me about multi-touch. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:31 am
Almost as many people viewed this spectacle online and in the non-British press as viewed the late Neil Armstrong's moonwalk, but the British press was asked to refrain from publishing the pics. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:21 am
Carlos moved to Florida in 1988. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:11 am
About 21 million people visit the Waterfront annually. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:25 am
al : LexisNexis, 2011 1 v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
City University London. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:08 pm
My research for the upcoming presentation brought to my attention the case law of Bankway Properties Ltd v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
The London studies involved more than 2100 people. [read post]
