Search for: "People v. Marques"
Results 61 - 80
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 4:32 pm
Bruce V. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:48 am
Well, criminal and civil enforcers, legislators, government ministers, backbenchers, policy-makers, diplomats, people who have influence and can pass legislation, people who can enforce it -- here's a challenge to you. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm
On Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
and serial MARQUES activists Adrian Smith and David Stone. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 2:08 am
Meanwhile you can almost hear the corks popping as the MARQUES Class 46 weblog celebrates the acquisition of its 1,800th email subscriber. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:56 pm
INTA filed a brief in Nokia Corporation v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
But what is MARQUES planning for its members? [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:21 am
and because of that she is, to all intents and purposes, akin to a brand or marque. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:45 am
254/09, Wilo SE v Office de l’harmonisation dans le marché intérieur (marques, dessins et modèles) (OHMI). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
Finally, Lauren V. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm
IPKat team member Jeremy is known to be a keen supporter of MARQUES, the association of European trade mark owners, practitioners and people who really appreciate a decent social programme when they see one. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:31 pm
The reference is eBay France v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm
KG v OHIM (IPKat) AG supports AB InBev’s case in BUD appeal: Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:10 am
So, if [and ONLY if, growls the Kat] you (i) love trade marks, (ii) either know how to blog or are willing to learn, (iii) are professionally or academically competent to discuss trade mark issues, (iv) possess a high level of literacy and proficiency in English and (v) you or your employer are a member of MARQUES, Jeremy would love to hear from you. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm
(84) Pittsburgh: People were going for DSTs early, so I joined the bandwagon. 10 [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:09 am
Co. v Horde (259 Ga. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:53 pm
As to the people in Utah, Ex parte Young, 209 US 123 (1908) gets cited. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
G-2/08 (PatLit) MARQUES and other organisation take united position on the Cooperation Fund (Class 46) EU communication on future of competition law framework for motor vehicle sector (BLOG@IP::JUR) EU ‘Friends of the Presidency Group’ discussing non-agricultural geographic indications (BLOG@IP::JUR) Scents and sense – or perfumes for peanuts? [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:51 pm
In Ogden v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 8:12 pm
” Calder v. [read post]
