Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 61 - 80
of 40,098
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2009, 2:08 pm
In People v Shapard (2009 NY Slip Op 00903 [4th Dept 2/6/09]) the Court held that a defendant may not waive his right to a presentence report prior to the imposition of a sentence of imprisonment.We agree with defendant that his waiver of the presentence report should not have been given effect pursuant to CPL 390.20 (4) (a). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
Evidence at trial, however, reflects that Miranda may have some serious mental problems. [read post]
16 May 2017, 11:53 am
"At midday on May 7, 2012, defendant attacked Shannon Collins, a woman whom he did not know, as she was walking on Broadway in Santa Cruz. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:58 am
Reversible error.So for any jurors who may be reading the California Appellate Report while you are still a juror: Stop now. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:52 pm
In the vehicular manslaughter case of People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 5:25 pm
2018 NY Slip 00005 By order of the Supreme Court on May 13, 2016, which heard a case against the defendant who is a level 1 sex offender. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:22 pm
. - One more thing, on this last day of May. [read post]
19 May 2023, 7:29 am
May 11, 2023) The decision in FTC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
Notwithstanding the fact that others may well have -- perhaps entirely validly -- a distinctly contrary view.To start with: Yes, it's a crime. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:41 pm
One a compliment and one a critique.First, good job catching these people. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
by Jill Paperno, First Assistant Public Defender and author of Representing the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseAmong some of yesterday’s disappointing Court of Appeals decisions there is one that can be useful to us – People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:49 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:40 pm
"Not much more than that right now; interested readers may peruse the decision here. [read post]
15 May 2009, 11:05 am
Davis, Case No. 282994, holding that People v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 12:12 pm
(Which may even go down a year after today's opinion.) [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:33 pm
King (7th Cir. 2003) 349 F.3d 964 (King) and United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm
Which is in turn why the expert's testimony is inadmissible to the per se offense at issue.Which some people may perhaps be fine with. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 9:43 am
People may listen or watch live broadcasts through the Montana State Judiciary Web site here. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:05 pm
(People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm
What most people will take away from Harris v. [read post]
