Search for: "People v. Mercer"
Results 61 - 80
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2011, 11:20 am
As former MoD legal adviser Nicolas Mercer declared this week, the ministry resisted the requirements of the Human Rights Act ‘at every twist and turn’. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 11:01 am
Citing Chief Justice Earl Warren’s short, unanimous decision in Brown v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Moving to the 1980s: it took empowering the courts with the Charter before bar entrance requirements banning non-citizens and bans on inter-provincial law firms were removed (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia [1989] 1 SCR 143 and Black v Law Society of Alberta [1989] 1 SCR 591, respectively). [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 12:26 pm
The first, by Mercer/Kadous, was about how juries are likely to react to precise/imprecise legal standards. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 11:46 am
Superior Ct., Chancery Div., Family Part, Mercer County). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
McGavin, Class Actions, 61 Mercer L. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
McGavin, Class Actions, 61 Mercer L. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:00 am
If you text the word invite, I‑N‑V‑I‑T‑E, we’ll know about that. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 11:44 pm
Frank Petro has received the highest rating (A/V) from Martindale-Hubbell, the world’s foremost authority on law firm credentials (the A/V rating is only for lawyers considered the top in their field). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:20 pm
Ridpath A, Reddy V, Layton M, et al. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 27, 2008 US v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 3:15 pm
See, of course, CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:50 pm
Beyer & Katherine V. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 12:39 pm
In last year’s Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 1:50 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
I had a lengthy meeting with three representatives from Napo, including Andy Stanton and Tony Mercer, in which they candidly acknowledged that the concerns I had raised in my original blog post were valid. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
Lumber Co. v. [read post]
