Search for: "People v. Neuberger"
Results 61 - 80
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
The context of s.82(2) in the Act tends to favour Lord Neuberger's interpretation, in view, for instance of the continued right to buy under s.121 which only a secure tenant can have, s.118. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
The context of s.82(2) in the Act tends to favour Lord Neuberger's interpretation, in view, for instance of the continued right to buy under s.121 which only a secure tenant can have, s.118. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:26 pm
In People v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:02 am
Tessa] Significant News A big news item for me and my homelessness colleagues was announced last week, ending a court process that has taken 2 years to decide what Lord Neuberger meant by the word ‘Significantly’ in the appeal hearing for Hotak v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:24 am
It also is important to the public at large, who have a right to know that the courts will, to some extent at least, protect their rights to privacy and not encourage people to steal otherwise private documents. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
The sole opinion is from Baroness Hale, although in effect a joint opinion with Lord Neuberger. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 pm
The case of ABC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
In a media release, the penal reform charity notes that in its experience of working in prisons, carrying out research and representing young people in custody, “segregating vulnerable and disturbed people tends to make their problems worse”. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:12 am
In this week’s case (ICBC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
On Monday 28 and Tuesday 29 November 2011 the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge LCJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Maurice Kay LJ) heard the appeals in Phillips v NGN and Coogan v NGN against orders of Mr Justice Vos in phone hacking claims (see [2011] EWHC 349 (Ch)). [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:22 am
The then Lord Justice Neuberger was one the Court of Appeal judges in the seminal 2005 privacy decision in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
Lord Neuberger gives five reasons: (1) the opening words of s 167(2) do not suggest that such an assessment is required. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords Opinions in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 were handed down today. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 3:55 pm
At paragraphs 39 et seq the court - for whom Neuberger LJ delivered the judgment - got to the heart of the appeal, though: "It was argued on behalf of Kent that this conclusion is inconsistent with the view reached by this court in Glaxo Group Limited v Dowelhurst Ltd [2005] ETMR 104 ... [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am
Ltd ([2008] 1 AC 1), and on the judgment of Lord Neuberger MR in Imerman v Tchenguiz ([2010] EWCA Civ 908). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
Says this Kat, this sort of service can be just as beneficial to people who are native English-speakers but who -- unlike their foreign counterparts -- have often had little or no chance to learn the rules. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
This is because stories about particular individuals are simply much more attractive to readers than stories about unidentified people. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal (5-2; Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale giving strong dissenting judgments). [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:50 pm
The Mayor of London v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:11 pm
Around 20,000 people watch each month. [read post]
