Search for: "People v. Neuberger" Results 61 - 80 of 163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
It is not sufficient that the repute would lead people in England to visit the venue when they visited Paris (Alain Bernardin et Cie v Pavilion Properties Ltd [1967] RPC 581). [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:59 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
If it were enough for a claimant to merely establish reputation in the jurisdiction without having a significant number of people who are customers, it would tip the balance too much in favour of protection for the trader. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:43 am by Paul Cruikshank
The dissent is notable, if only for the fact the President of the court, Lord Neuberger, and Lord Sumption are the two dissenters. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:26 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Neuberger and Lord Mance, however, did state that although this was an inappropriate case in which to decide the proper approach to the defence of illegality, there was a need for review of the law of illegality by the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:39 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
SSUK also passed on the names of two people who contacted them about volunteering, who then travelled to France and did a day’s work on the Steve Irwin. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Parliament has further expressly provided, in sections 15 and 35, for disabled people to have rights in respect of the accommodation which they occupy which are different from and extra to the rights of non-disabled people. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 The panel will be Lord Neuberger  Lady Hale, Lord Clarke Lord Wilson and Lord Toulson. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
On 12-13 November, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Dyson, Hughes and Hodge) heard the case of Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions, a challenge to the broad power of detention contained in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 9:38 am by S
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal (5-2; Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale giving strong dissenting judgments). [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:40 am by Charlie Tomlinson, Olswang LLP
Lord Neuberger then went on to discuss anonymous blogging in the context of the Internet: “The Internet offers an unprecedented number of people the capacity to publish with ease, at little or no expense and, perhaps most importantly, with relative anonymity. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:30 am by Blog Editorial
This summer, some of the editors of the UKSC Blog were invited to the UKSC to meet and interview Lord Neuberger. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 5:11 pm by INFORRM
 They were as follows: Social Media: How many people use Twitter and what do we think about it? [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:52 am by NATASHA NGUYEN
Supreme Court decision The unanimous judgment of the Supreme Court was delivered by Lords Neuberger and Toulson. [read post]