Search for: "People v. Pell" Results 61 - 80 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2011, 7:29 am by Dave
R(Pelling) v Newham LBC [2011] EWHC 3265 (Admin), 28.10.2011 (not on Bailii yet)It’s fair to say that I have an unnatural (purely) academic interest in high hedges – my colleagues laugh every time I try to discuss it sensibly. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am by Kali Borkoski
” Bell, 441 U.S. at 546-47, (citing Pell v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 10:44 am by Lovechilde
Under a Supreme Court decision called Printz v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:43 am by Matthew Flinn
There is no explicit right of access to information in the ECHR, and as was noted in a previous post, both the European Court of Human Rights and domestic courts have been clear that, as yet, such a right is not within the interpretive scope of the right to freedom of expression set out in Article 10 (see paragraph 36 of the decision in R v Bow County Court, ex p Pelling [2001] 1 UKHRR 165). [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 4:15 pm by Charon QC
  Pelle pleaded guilty to incitement of violent disorder. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm by INFORRM
Thornton claims her book is based on hour-long interviews with more than 250 people. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:24 pm by WIMS
I think the American people are tired of that. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:51 pm by WIMS
But I'll tell you what it will do: it will destroy jobs and impose a real on burden families every time they fill up at the pump -- at a time when people are looking for relief instead. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:04 am by INFORRM
Mr Justice Tugendhat handed down judgments in the cases of Hunt v Evening Standard ([2011] EWHC 272 (QB)) and Henry v News Group ([2011] EWHC 296 (QB)) and Mr Justice Eady gave judgment in Lord Ashcroft v Foley ([2011] EWHC 292 (QB)). [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am by steven perkins
It expresses both the aspirations of indigenous peoples around the world and those of States in seeking to improve their relations with indigenous peoples. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
We thank Mr Benjamin Pell for providing us with a note of these reasons. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am by INFORRM
Mr Benjamin Pell suggests that the previous record was 332 days (ending with the trial in Howlett v Holding on 23 May 2005). [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Benjamin Pell suggests that the previous record was 332 days (ending with the trial in Howlett v Holding on 23 May 2005). [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm by NL
In R (on the application of Wilson) v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm by NL
In R (on the application of Wilson) v. [read post]