Search for: "People v. Photo" Results 61 - 80 of 3,809
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2024, 6:06 am by Melanie O'Brien
Recent protests in Armenia demonstrate that this territorial exchange is very unpopular with the Armenian people and that the issue remains live and concerning. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:55 am by Yousuf Syed Khan
On May 20, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) filed applications for arrest warrants in the Situation in the State of Palestine. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
**Photo by 6428W Digital ArtParticipation in the legal system involves a lot of writing. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
All it means, as Khan said in an interview Monday, is that “no people anywhere are saints. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
(Editor’s Note: This article is part of our new symposium on the ICC and Israel-Hamas war.) [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:28 pm by Mitch Stoltz
People creating works of history or biography frequently reproduce excerpts from others’ copyrighted photos, videos, or artwork as indispensable historical evidence. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am by Mary B. McCord
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am by Mutasim Ali
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm by Ilya Somin
(AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) (NA)  As Eugene Volokh notes, yesterday, in Yellowhammer Fund v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the New York Court of Appeals chips away a little further on eyewitness testimony and holds that the criminal conviction needs to be vacated.The case is People v. [read post]