Search for: "People v. Ring"
Results 61 - 80
of 865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2023, 6:49 pm
Lindh v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
A recent California Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
In Olmstead v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:19 pm
In Meadows v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:23 am
The obvious chief criticism that can be made against current Eight Amendment jurisprudence is the ambiguous nature of the "evolving standards of decency" established in Trop v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 8:00 am
Ring. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Fire Alarms are Ringing—U.S. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 12:18 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
[Cite to Nunes v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:07 pm
Fortunately, a new case from the Florida Supreme Court Osborne v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 1:10 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:56 am
Ten people were arrested based on information from the applicant. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 8:27 am
Berisha v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 12:17 pm
Summerlin addressed the retroactivity of Ring v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:15 am
Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 1:24 pm
See, e.g., Sega v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:37 pm
These cases are reviewed below: People v Newton, 2007 NY Slip Op 03754 - "No Means No" The defendant was charged with, inter alia, sodomy in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.40[3]). [read post]
