Search for: "People v. Roberts (1981)" Results 61 - 80 of 170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
        Argued October 12, 1993 -- Decided May 26, 1994On certification to the Superior Court, Law Division, Middlesex County.Simon Louis Rosenbach, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Robert W. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:24 pm by Peter Margulies
The approach to balancing the equities taken by the Court reflects time-honored equitable principles outlined by Chief Justice Roberts in his opinion for the Court in Nken v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:00 am by Jack Sharman
Of the making of lists of books, there shall be no end. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
One, the most recent, is a John Roberts opinion that said, the Phelps people, that church out in Kansas, had the right to picket horrible, offensive with signs at military funerals. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:12 am
Charter 77 and the Human Rights in Czechoslovakia (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981). [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:05 am
Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 460, n. 4 (1981) (describing a `container’ as `any object capable of holding another object’). [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Staff of 12 v. 10 for PTO recording division. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by David Kris
Defense Secretary Robert Gates said in 2010 that “Hezbollah has far more rockets and missiles than most governments in the world. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:06 pm
The Supreme Court scene isn't long, but it's powerful.First Monday in October (1981). [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Buck 2007 The Persons Case: The Origins and Legacy of the Fight for Legal Personhood by Robert J. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
A Law Commission report on Breach of Confidence in 1981 raised hopes that legislation might happen, even appending a brief draft bill, but no-one was interested so that was that. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Lord Chancellor was reported to have said that the criticism by Sir Robert, if correctly attributed, was “manifestly a ridiculous exaggeration”. [read post]