Search for: "People v. Shah"
Results 61 - 80
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
Thuraissigiam (2020) (see Aditi Shah’s analysis here). [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:06 pm
Citing Jacobson v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
This is because the case will be suitable to proceed as a class action if some issues, including common impact, may be resolved for a class of people using common evidence at a common issues trial. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:11 am
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah of CMS preview the appeal to be heard by the Supreme Court on 12-13 May 2020 in the matter of Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
In East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
The task force will hear testimony from Eric Fanning, the president and CEO of Aerospace Industries Association; Raj Shah, the chairman and co-founder of Arceo.ai; and Chris Brose, the chief strategy officer of Anduril Industries. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will hold an event featuring Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi on the relationship between U.S. and Pakistanin regards to Afghanistan. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:55 am
In Haidak v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
India Firstpost had an article “Supreme Court to hear The Wire’s plea on 27 August in criminal defamation case filed against it by Jay Shah”. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 9:02 am
From People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am
Paras Shah analyzed a U.N. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Mr Adil Shah is a Pakistani national. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Panel – Ethical and Legal Challenges in a “Right to Try” World Moderator: Patricia Zettler, Georgia State University College of Law, Developments at FDA: Expanded Access and Investigational Medicines as Treatment Holly Fernandez Lynch, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Protecting Patients from Right to Try Erin Talati Paquette, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Nusinersen as a Paradigm for Emerging Therapies: How Ethical Challenges of Expanded Access… [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
" Indeed, mandamus may only be used to compel a public officer to execute a legal duty; it may not "direct how [the officer] shall perform that duty," as was noted in People ex rel. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
" Indeed, mandamus may only be used to compel a public officer to execute a legal duty; it may not "direct how [the officer] shall perform that duty," as was noted in People ex rel. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
This rule was summarised in the following terms by May LJ in Shah v Standard Chartered Bank [1999] QB 241: “The repetition rule in its simplest application is that, if you publish a statement that Y said that X is guilty, it is not a defence to an action for defamation to establish the literal truth of the publication, ie that it is indeed true that Y said that X is guilty. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
This rule was summarised in the following terms by May LJ in Shah v Standard Chartered Bank [1999] QB 241: “The repetition rule in its simplest application is that, if you publish a statement that Y said that X is guilty, it is not a defence to an action for defamation to establish the literal truth of the publication, ie that it is indeed true that Y said that X is guilty. [read post]
