Search for: "People v. Small (1970)" Results 61 - 80 of 330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Counterfactuals are most powerful when we are asked to imagine a small change and when the change might have resulted from a different choice made by one person or a small group of people. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
  What these people had demonstrated during this period of time was that they did not recognize the sovereignty of the People’s Republic of China over HKSAR, and they did not support the policy of the “One Country, Two systems”. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
United States. 379 U.S. 241 (1964) (commerce power could be used to apply an anti-discrimination statute to an establishment that served people in interstate travel and that could affect national policy); Katzenbach v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 3: CopyrightSarah Polcz, Loyalties v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:00 pm by Eric Biber
  Instead, it was the Congress of the 1970s that wrote a broad statute – and the Supreme Court of 2006 that interpreted that statute to (more or less) require EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles (Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Dunkins (EFF) New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional (EFF) EFF Files Amicus Brief Arguing Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment (Ongoing case of People v Dawes in SF Superior Court re geofence warrants)  People v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 10:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court decision in Texas v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 8:42 pm by Michael O'Hear
  Increased severity in the 1970s and 1980s did not prevent crime rates from climbing in those decades. [read post]