Search for: "People v. Small (1988)" Results 61 - 80 of 301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The first thing you note from this survey is the small usage of this provision, roughly 30 reported cases in 30 years. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The first thing you note from this survey is the small usage of this provision, roughly 30 reported cases in 30 years. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
State (ruling that the right to privacy protects small amounts of personal marijuana use); and People v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
David Hyman & David Franklyn A couple of small empirical studies and armchair empiricism; lots of regulatory interest. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Glendening, 709 A.2d 1230 (Md. 1988) and City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am by Stephen Page
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 533 N.E.2d 748, 755 (Ohio 1988). [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
” This is just a small sampling of the many cases diverging on how to apply Tinker — and it stands to reason that the courts’ confusion yields even more confusion among administrators, teachers, and students. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
* The IPKat thanks Daniel Gallagher (Mayer Brown International LLP) for picking up a small but significant error in the original version of this post. [read post]