Search for: "People v. Smith (1984)" Results 61 - 80 of 192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm by Jamie Markham
Howren, 312 N.C. 454 (1984), there is no equal protection violation when the same group of people (here, 16-year-olds alleged to have committed a Class H felony) are treated differently at different times (here, before and after the effective date of the Juvenile Justice Reinvestment Act). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am by Jeff Gamso
The Queen, 5 Best & Smith, 635, 642, 643; Selvester v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 7:14 am by Alex Phipps
The officers saw two people inside an SUV and approached the vehicle; as they approached, they smelled marijuana. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Henry: Right to counsel exists when someone other than the police gathers evidence. 1984 McKaskle v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Smith, in 1920, the Court prohibited the use of direct democracy (in that case the referendum device, a close cousin of the initiative) that the people of Ohio tried to employ to undo the state’s (already finalized) ratification of a federal constitutional amendment under the terms of Article V of the Constitution, which also uses the word “Legislature. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am by Tobias Thienel
Republic of Argentina, 965 F.2d 699, 718 (9th Cir. 1992); Smith v. [read post]