Search for: "People v. Standard Accident Insurance Co." Results 61 - 80 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  A “failure-to-warn-adequately case should not be submitted to the jury unless there is substantial evidence that an adequate warning would have been read and heeded and would have prevented the accident. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
The only really serious breach of that standard was market share liability in Sindell v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
 This could result in no postponement of limitation periods for people involved in motor vehicle accidents in which vehiclar damage occurs. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 12:12 am
Gulf Insurance Co., defendant-appellant APPELLATE TERMCriminal PracticeGuilty Plea Did Not Foreclose Right to Appeal; Defendant Forfeited Review of Constitutional Issue People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Historians tell us that the connection between access to health insurance and employment was an accident. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:12 am
Co., 25 Misc. 3d 1236A, 906 N.Y.S.2d 772 (2009) (use of a website to compare a competitor to a douche product was an opinion and did not implicate the knowledge of falsity exclusion); Baxter v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme Court’s March… [read post]