Search for: "People v. Tiffany" Results 61 - 80 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
He did not hear her state, “you don’t know me, but you will see,” but noted that people were talking and moving their chairs, preventing him from being able to hear clearly (Tr. 63). [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
He did not hear her state, “you don’t know me, but you will see,” but noted that people were talking and moving their chairs, preventing him from being able to hear clearly (Tr. 63). [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Suggests at one point that Tiffany v. eBay should’ve come out the other way if Tiffany were a better corp. citizen, but Sheff thinks that’s a terrible idea since that case was about competition in the secondary market. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
The first is in Seila Law v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:00 am
Reportedly 37 people were injured when a shell malfunctioned and fireworks were set off in a crowd of onlookers. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
 Also promoted to the Court of Appeal in the same batch of ten are Sir Geoffrey Vos (remember United Airlines v United Airways, here, Lady Gaga v Moshi Monsters, here?) [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 11:52 am by Ron Coleman
 The reason is that, as we all know, dilution can come about either as a result of blurring — he gives the example of “an upscale restaurant [that] calls itself “Tiffany” posited in Ty Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” At the ACS Blog, Sara Totonchi urges the court to review Raulerson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Nasrallah v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]