Justia Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II

6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude

He makes a similar inference (at 61) from the silence of most people on the issue of self-execution. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

CELEBRATING BLACK HISTORY MONTH: Thurgood Marshall

5 Feb 2024, 7:18 am by GSU Law Student

While there, he studied under Charles Hamilton Houston, the vice dean at the law school and later, the director of NAACP’s Legal Defense and Education Fund. [read post]

The Blackacre Times - http://theblackacretimes.com/

A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Five: Trump’s Argument That He Did Not Engage in an Insurrection

4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman

” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern

4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman

Fund v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”

3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman

This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

Look Away: How the Supreme Court Could Set Aside Trump’s Disqualification for Insurrection under the Fourteenth Amendment

2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am by Dean Falvy

Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]

Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/

[Kurt Lash] Section Three and the "First Insurrection" … That Wasn't

29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash

Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

[Josh Blackman] Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar Retreat From Their "Global" Rule for the "Offices" and "Officers" of the Constitution

27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman

[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

The Intersubjectivity of Plausibility/Causation/Perspective: Interim Measures Order on the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) With Text of Order, and the Declaratons, Separate and Dissenting Opinions

27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm

(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]

Law at the End of the Day - https://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/

Cybersecurity of Arbitration Transcripts

25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am by Rob Robinson

That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]

ComplexDiscovery - https://complexdiscovery.com/