Search for: "People v. Williams (1977)"
Results 61 - 80
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:43 am
As a law professor, she co-authored an amicus brief for the American Civil Liberties Union in the important 1977 case on capital punishment and sexual assault, Coker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 2:55 am
Justice William Brennan wrote the dissent. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:55 am
Justice William Brennan wrote the dissent. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 2:55 am
Justice William Brennan wrote the dissent. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
People v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:38 pm
Williams (1998), 124 C.C.C. (3d) 481 at 494 (S.C.C.); R. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:13 pm
See People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
Lago v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
I never understood why this lovely provision had to be scrapped in 1977 since the principle seemed sound enough to extend to other limited-term rights too. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm
A lot of the essays are focused around assessments of Horwitz' work -- for instance, William Fisher's foreword talks about the continuity between questions that Horwitz addressed in Transformation of American Law, 1780-1860 (1977) and Transformation of American Law, 1870-1960 (1992). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Rees decision and approved the use of midazolam in 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Williams: Type of police questioning beyond routine interrogation also triggers the right to counsel. 1979 Scott v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
In the Schedule to the Fidelity Trust Act 1977. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:48 am
National Audubon Society (2d Cir. 1977).) [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Supreme Court held in Gregg v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
For people like Mr. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
There cannot be a rule under which "poor people ... have their speech enjoined, while the rich are allowed to speak so long as they pay damages. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:28 am
The answer to the above question is partially answered in the 1977, Texas Supreme Court case, Robert William Ford, Jr., et al. v State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. [read post]
