Search for: "People v. Woodward" Results 61 - 80 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star… [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:49 pm by Eric
Therefore, we find that there was insufficient evidence that Gordon's use of the Village's computers for personal purposes constituted Theft in Office pursuant to R.C. 2921.41 * Woodward v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  Others will see the decision as a disconcerting departure signalling a return to the approach taken in cases such as Woodward v Hutchins ([1977] 1 WLR 760) and Flitcroft([2003] QB 195). [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm by INFORRM
  Others will see the decision as a disconcerting departure signalling a return to the approach taken in cases such as Woodward v Hutchins ([1977] 1 WLR 760) and Flitcroft ([2003] QB 195). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm by David Tanenhaus
In its landmark 2005 decision in Roper v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:13 am by Laura Orr
James Tyler Nix 2) Jason Carlile: District attorney for Linn County 3) Lyn Woodward: Panel attorney for the California Court of Appeals, represented Gregorie Diaz in People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:05 am by JB
As the Court explained in Bartnicki v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:28 am by INFORRM
” [97] The Judge ( and later the Court of Appeal ) also considered and effectively distinguished the 1977  case of Woodward v Hutchings, which was often relied upon by the media seeking to justify intrusive publications. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:08 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Woodward, 277 F.3d 87, 90-92 (1st Cir. 2002) (involving multiple convictions between 22 and 27 years old); United States v. [read post]