Search for: "Pepper v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 434
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 5:20 pm
In October, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a petition for rehearing en banc by the United States Federal Trade Commission in its Qualcomm case. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:28 pm
Notably, Professor Hoeppner represented complainants against Google in the DG COMP investigation that resulted in the Google Shopping decision.When the Supreme Court of the United States allowed the Pepper v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
United States, 389 F.3d 1219, 1224 (Fed. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 7:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
In briefs in both cases last month, the outgoing acting solicitor general, Jeffrey Wall, urged the justices to grant cert and vacate the court of appeals’ decisions (both of which went against Trump) under United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
” The brief of the United States, arguing in support of petitioners, criticized the decisions of the circuit court and outlined the position of the United States regarding the expropriation exception. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 2:46 pm
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:21 am
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
” In Gravel v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
Dupart v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
§ 1983, provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ... subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law[.] [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:43 am
On Friday, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Epic Games' motion for a preliminary injunction against Apple only with respect to its developer account for Unreal Engine, but it's still up to Epic itself to #FreeFortnite, though Epic's aggressive attitude makes a Ninth Circuit decision likely to be inevitable before the iOS version of Fortnite will return to the App Store.Late on Monday,… [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:05 am
Qualcomm this year) may even find it highly dissuasive.Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who is presiding over the Epic Games v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 10:50 pm
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is still working on her decision on Epic Games' motion for a preliminary injunction against Apple. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:33 am
Epic Games v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:11 pm
Pepper decision on consumer standing in an App Store antitrust case as well as a 2013 decision according to which patent-related agreements can be evaluated under antitrust law (FTC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 5:30 am
Even though the Pepper decision on standing went against Apple, the closeness of the Pepper v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
Neither of her parents attended college: Her father, Nathan, came to the United States from Russia as a teenager and worked as a furrier; her mother, Celia Amster Bader, was born a few months after her parents arrived in the country from Austria and worked in a garment factory to put her brother through college. [read post]
